Home /// CV /// Publications

Monographs

(4) Koch, T., Seeger, C., & Müller, P. (in prep. for 2025). Das Experiment in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft. Grundlagen, Durchführung und Auswertung experimenteller Forschung (2nd, fully revised edition). Springer VS.

(3) Koch, T., Peter, C., & Müller, P. (2019). Das Experiment in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft. Grundlagen, Durchführung und Auswertung experimenteller Forschung. Springer VS. /// https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19754-4

(2) Müller, P. (2016). Die Wahrnehmung des Medienwandels. Eine Exploration ihrer Dimensionen, Entstehungsbedingungen und Folgen. Springer VS. /// https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12812-8

(1) Müller, P. (2010). Der Third-Person-Effekt als Darstellungsphänomen. Lit.

Editions

(5) Dan, V., Rußmann, U., Schulz, A., & Müller, P. (eds., in prep. for 2026). Communication in Election Campaigns: Staggering Changes or Same Old, Same Old? Special Issue of Media and Communication.

(4) Krämer, B., & Müller, P. (eds., 2022). Questions of Communicative Change and Continuity. In Memory of Wolfram Peiser. Nomos. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748928232

(3) Müller, P., Geiß, S., Schemer, C., Naab, T. K., & Peter, C. (eds., 2019). Dynamische Prozesse der öffentlichen Kommunikation. Methodische Herausforderungen. Halem.

(2) Müller, P., & Denner, N. (eds., 2018). Debatte: Postfaktizität – der (neue) Kampf um die Wahrheit und die Kommunikationswissenschaft. aviso – Informationsdienst der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, (66). /// open access: https://www.dgpuk.de/sites/default/files/Aviso%20_66_01-2018.pdf

(1) Hohlfeld, R., Müller, P., Richter, A., & Zacher, F. (eds., 2010). Crossmedia – Wer bleibt auf der Strecke? Beiträge aus Wissenschaft und Praxis. Lit. (2nd edition, 2013)

Articles in Journals & Conference Proceedings

(34) Chan, C.-h., Freudenthaler, R., & Müller, P. (2024). Developing a synthetic news corpus to validate generic frame detection methods. SCM – Studies in Communication and Media, 13, 101-124. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2024-1-101 /// open data & open materials: https://osf.io/gkft5/

(33) Schäfer, S., Müller, P., & Ziegele, M. (2024). The double-edged sword of online deliberation: How evidence-based user comments both decrease and increase discussion participation intentions on social media. New Media & Society, 26, 1403-1428. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211073059 /// open data & open materials: https://osf.io/zyq4j/

(32) Iana, A., Alam, M., Grote, A., Ludwig, K., Müller, P., Weinhardt, C., & Paulheim, H. (2023). NeMig - A bilingual news collection and knowledge graph about migration. Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on News Recommendation and Analytics (INRA 2023) in conjunction with ACM RecSys 2023. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.00550 // open data (upon request): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7442425

(31) Ludwig, K., Grote, A., Iana, A., Alam, M., Paulheim, H., Sack, H, Weinhardt, C., & Müller, P. (2023). Divided by the algorithm? The (limited) effects of content- and sentiment-based news recommendation on affective, ideological, and perceived polarization. Social Science Computer Review, 41, 2188-2210. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221149290

(30) Müller, P., & Bach, R. L. (2023). Populist alternative news use and its role for elections: Web-tracking and survey evidence from two campaign periods. New Media & Society, 25, 2663–2683. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211032969 /// open materials: https://osf.io/67rwq/

(29) Müller, P., Chan, C.-h., Ludwig, K., Freudenthaler, R., & Wessler, H. (2023). Differential racism in the news: Using semi-supervised machine learning to distinguish explicit and implicit stigmatization of ethnic and religious groups in journalistic discourse. Political Communication, 40, 396-414. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2193146 /// pre-registration & open materials: https://osf.io/hncx4/

(28) Müller, P., & Freudenthaler, R. (2022). Right-wing, populist, controlled by foreign powers? Topic diversification and partisanship in the content structures of German-language alternative media. Digital Journalism, 10, 1363-1386. /// https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2058972

(27) Alam, M., Iana, A., Grote, A., Ludwig, K., Müller, P., & Paulheim, H. (2022). Towards analyzing the bias of news recommender systems using sentiment and stance detection. WWW ‘22: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2022, 448-457. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.1145/3487553.3524674

(26) Müller, P., & Denner, N. (2021). Populist words speak louder? Ideology-inconsistent personalization and voting for populist candidates. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33, 799-817. /// https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa042 /// open data & open materials: https://osf.io/scfw5/

(25) Müller, P., & Schulz, A. (2021). Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and Co. Information, Communication and Society, 24, 277-293. /// https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1646778 /// open access (postprint): https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/gvb39

(24) Schemer, C., Masur, P. K., Geiß, S., Müller, P., & Schäfer, S. (2021). The impact of Internet and social media use on well-being: A longitudinal analysis of adolescents across nine years. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26, 1–21. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa014 /// open materials: https://osf.io/fdp39/

(23) Wettstein, M., Schulz, A., Steenbergen, M., Schemer, C., Müller, P., Wirz, D. S., & Wirth, W. (2020). Measuring populism across nations: Testing for measurement invariance of an inventory of populist attitudes. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 32, 284–305. /// https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edz018

(22) Schulz, A., Wirth, W., & Müller, P. (2020). We are the people and you are fake news: A social identity approach to populist citizens’ false consensus and hostile media perceptions. Communication Research, 47, 201-226. /// https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218794854 /// open access (postprint): https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-158179

(21) Müller, P., & Schulz, A. (2019). Facebook or Fakebook? How users’ perceptions of ‘fake news’ are related to their evaluation and verification of news on Facebook. SCM – Studies in Communication and Media, 8, 547-559. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2019-4-547

(20) Wettstein, M., Esser, F., Büchel, F., Schemer, C., Wirz, D. S., Schulz, A., Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Müller, P., & Wirth, W. (2019). What drives populist styles? Analyzing immigration and labor market news in 11 countries. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96, 516-536. /// https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018805408

(19) Müller, P., Schmitt, J. B., & Krämer, B. (2018). Of rules and role models: How perceptions of parents’ mediation and modelling contribute to individuals’ media innovativeness. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62, 685-703. /// https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2018.1519569 /// open access (postprint): https://osf.io/2x59t/

(18) Wirz, D. S., Wettstein, M., Schulz, A., Müller, P., Schemer, C., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Wirth, W. (2018). The effects of right-wing populist communication on emotions and cognitions toward immigrants. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23, 496-516. /// https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218788956

(17) Schemer, C., Wirth, W., Wettstein, M., Müller, P., Schulz, A., & Wirz, D. (2018). Wirkung populistischer Kommunikation. Populismus in den Medien, Wirkungen und deren Randbedingungen. Communicatio Socialis, 51, 118-130. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.5771/0010-3497-2018-2-118

(16) Schulz, A., Müller, P., Schemer, C., Wirz, D. S., Wettstein, M., & Wirth, W. (2018). Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30, 316–326. /// https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw037

(15) Schindler, J., & Müller, P. (2018). Design follows politics? The visualization of political orientation in newspaper page layout. Visual Communication, 17, 141–161. /// https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357217746812

(14) Müller, P., Schemer, C., Wettstein, M., Schulz, A., Wirz, D. S., Engesser, S., & Wirth, W. (2017). The polarizing impact of news coverage on populist attitudes in the public: Evidence from a panel study in four European democracies. Journal of Communication, 67, 968–992. /// https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12337 /// open access (postprint): https://osf.io/nf5kx/

(13) Schindler, J., Krämer, B., & Müller, P. (2017). Looking left or looking right? Effects of newspaper layout style on the perception of political news. European Journal of Communication, 32, 348-366. /// https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117718463

(12) Schäfer, S., Sülflow, M., & Müller, P. (2017). The special taste of snack news: An application of niche theory to understand the appeal of Facebook as a source for political news. First Monday, 22. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i4.7431

(11) Scherr, S., & Müller, P. (2017). How perceived persuasive intent and reactance contribute to third-person perceptions: Evidence from two experiments. Mass Communication and Society, 20, 315-335. /// https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1250911

(10) Müller, P., & Hohlfeld, R. (2017). How journalists think about media effects — And why we should care. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 25, 88-100. /// https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2017.1286343 /// open access (postprint): https://osf.io/tn2b4

(9) Müller, P., & Scherr, S. (2017). Reducing the bias: How perspective-taking affects first- and third-person perceptions of media influence. Communication Research Reports, 34, 134-142. /// https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1280453

(8) Krämer, B., & Müller, P. (2016). Is a theory of media and communication history possible (and necessary)? SCM – Studies in Communication / Media, 3, 307-333. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2016-3-307

(7) Müller, P., Schneiders, P., & Schäfer, S. (2016). Appetizer or main dish? Explaining the use of Facebook news posts as a substitute for other news sources. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 431-441. /// https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.003 /// open access (postprint): https://osf.io/cjz54

(6) Müller, P. (2013). National identity building through patterns of an international third-person perception in news coverage. International Communication Gazette, 75, 732-749. /// https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048513482546 /// open access (postprint): https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-58485-1

(5) Krämer, B., & Müller, P. (2013). Die (Geschichts-)Theorien der Mediengeschichtsforschung – Ansätze für Typologien. Medien & Zeit, 28(2), 53-68. /// open access: http://medienundzeit.at/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/MZ_2013-02.pdf

(4) Scherr, S., Müller, P., & Fast, V. (2013). Do third-person perceptions amplify exemplification effects? International Journal of Communication, 7, 1603-1621. /// open access: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1725/957

(3) Müller, P., & Hohlfeld, R. (2013). Journalistische Vorstellungen von Medienwirkungen. Dimensionen – Entstehungsbedingungen – Folgen. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 61, 166-182. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2013-2-166

(2) Scherr, S., Müller, P., & Fast, V. (2013). Single comments or average ratings: Which elements of RateMyProfessors.com shape university students’ judgments and course choice intentions? Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25, 131-141. /// https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9164-z

(1) Müller, P. (2011). „Wir sind besser als die anderen.“ Optimistic Bias als Schema der Medienberichterstattung. Publizistik, 56, 441-459. /// https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-011-0130-9 /// open access (postprint): http://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-491

Handbook Chapters & Encyclopedia Entries

(5) Müller, P. (in prep. for 2025). Experiments. In A. Nai, M. Grömping, & D. Wirz (eds.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Political Communication. Elgar.

(4) Müller, P., & Schäfer, S. (2017). Latent mean (comparison). In J. Matthes (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Wiley. /// https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0132 /// open access: https://kommueller.github.io/fulltexts/mueller_schaefer_2017.pdf

(3) Schemer, C., & Müller, P. (2017). Europe: Representations of ethnic minorities and their effects. In C. P. Campbell (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Media and Race (pp. 259-268). Routledge.

(2) Müller, P. (2013). Ralf Hohlfeld. In M. Meyen & T. Wiedemann (eds.), Biografisches Lexikon der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Halem. /// open access: http://blexkom.halemverlag.de/ralf-hohlfeld

(1) Müller, P. (2013). Wolfram Peiser. In M. Meyen & T. Wiedemann (eds.), Biografisches Lexikon der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Halem. /// open access: http://blexkom.halemverlag.de/wolfram-peiser

Contributions to Edited Volumes & Online Collections

(17) Ludwig, K., Chan, C.-h., Freudenthaler, R., Müller, P., & Wessler, H. (2024). Differenzieller Rassismus in den Nachrichten: Implizite und expliziter Stigmatisierungen. In C. Nuernbergk, J. Haßler, J. Schützeneder, & N. F. Schumacher (eds.), Politischer Journalismus: Konstellationen – Muster – Dynamiken (pp. 113-130). Nomos. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748939702-113

(16) Ludwig, K., & Müller, P. (2022). Does social media use promote political mass polarization? A structured literature review. In B. Krämer & P. Müller (eds.), Questions of Communicative Change and Continuity. In Memory of Wolfram Peiser (pp. 118-166). Nomos. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748928232-118

(15) Krämer, B., & Müller, P. (2022). Cycles and coexistences, comparisons and catastrophies. An introduction to the volume. In B. Krämer & P. Müller (eds.), Questions of Communicative Change and Continuity. In Memory of Wolfram Peiser (pp. 7-22). Nomos. /// open access: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748928232-7

(14) Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Büchel, F., Wettstein, M., Wirz, D. S., Schulz, A., Müller, P., Schemer, C., Wirth, W., & Esser, F. (2020). Populist communication in the news media: The role of cultural and journalistic factors in ten democracies. In B. Krämer & C. Holtz-Bacha (eds.), Perspectives on Populism and the Media. Avenues for Research (pp. 57-82). Nomos. /// https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845297392-57

(13) Müller, P. (2020). Polarisation of the public. How the relationship between journalism and citizens is changing – and why [English translation of Müller, 2018]. In P. Limbourg & R. Grätz (eds.), Spin on the Internet: Fake News, Bots and Hate Speech (pp. 29–39). Steidl.

(12) Schemer, C., Geiß, S., & Müller, P. (2019). Applying the reinforcing spirals model to dynamic communication phenomena: Conceptual and statistical pitfalls. In P. Müller, S. Geiß, C. Schemer, T. K. Naab, & C. Peter (eds.), Dynamische Prozesse der öffentlichen Kommunikation. Methodische Herausforderungen (pp. 262-285). Halem.

(11) Müller, P., Geiß, S., Schemer, C., Naab, T. K., & Peter, C. (2019). Die Dynamik öffentlicher Kommunikationsprozesse als Herausforderung für die empirische Forschung. In P. Müller, S. Geiß, C. Schemer, T. K. Naab, & C. Peter (eds.), Dynamische Prozesse der öffentlichen Kommunikation. Methodische Herausforderungen (pp. 9-17). Halem.

(10) Müller, P. (2019). Warnen oder Löschen: Wie sollen Plattformen mit Falschmeldungen verfahren? In Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (ed.), Dossier Digitale Desinformation. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. /// open access: http://www.bpb.de/gesellschaft/digitales/digitale-desinformation/290481/wie-sollen-plattformen-mit-falschmeldungen-verfahren

(9) Müller, P. (2018). Polarisierung des Publikums. Wie sich die Beziehung zwischen Journalismus und Bürgern verändert – und warum. In P. Limbourg & R. Grätz (eds.), Meinungsmache im Netz: Fake News, Bots und Hate Speech (pp. 33-43). Steidl. /// open access (postprint): https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-60154-4

(8) Müller, P. (2016). National identity building as a mediated process: A two-level model of its functions and dysfunctions. In J. Grimm, L. Huddy, P. Schmidt, & J. Seethaler (eds.), Dynamics of National Identity. Media and Societal Factors of What We Are (pp. 319-333). Routledge.

(7) Müller, P. (2015). Gib mir Orientierung, gib mir Redestoff! Wie sich die Wahrnehmung des Medienwandels auf die Zahlungsbereitschaft für journalistische Inhalte auswirkt. In S. Pagel (ed.), Schnittstellen (in) der Medienökonomie (pp. 361-378). Nomos. /// https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845264868-361

(6) Müller, P. (2015). Kognitive und affektive Barrieren bei der Kommunikation politischer Reformen. In R. Fröhlich & T. Koch (eds.), Politik – PR – Persuasion. Strukturen, Funktionen und Wirkungen politischer Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (pp. 171-191). Springer VS. /// https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01683-8_9

(5) Fast, V., Müller, P., & Scherr, S. (2014). Der kombinierte Einsatz von Daten und Fallbeispielen in den Medien: Wirkung und Glaubwürdigkeit. In W. Loosen & M. Dohle (eds.), Journalismus und (sein) Publikum. Schnittstellen zwischen Journalismusforschung und Rezeptions- und Wirkungsforschung (pp. 317-334). Springer VS. /// https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19821-7_17

(4) Müller, P., Scherr, S., & Fast, V. (2013). Der Einfluss wahrgenommener Medienwirkungen auf die Verarbeitung von Fallbeispielen. In O. Jandura, A. Fahr, & H.-B. Brosius (eds.), Theorieanpassungen in der digitalen Medienwelt (pp. 141-158). Nomos. /// https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845242682-141

(3) Müller, P. (2010). Das Legitimationsproblem des öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks im Zeitalter der Medienkonvergenz. In R. Hohlfeld, P. Müller, A. Richter, & F. Zacher (eds.), Crossmedia – Wer bleibt auf der Strecke? Beiträge aus Wissenschaft und Praxis (pp. 172-193). Lit.

(2) Hohlfeld, R., Müller, P., Richter, A., & Zacher, F. (2010). Der Crossmedia-Zug rollt. Wer oder was bleibt auf der Strecke? In R. Hohlfeld, P. Müller, A. Richter, & F. Zacher (eds.), Crossmedia – Wer bleibt auf der Strecke? Beiträge aus Wissenschaft und Praxis (pp. 11-18). Lit.

(1) Müller, P. (2010). Tabloid Britain – Broadsheet Germany? Die Bedeutung der Boulevardpresse für die politische Kommunikation in Großbritannien und Deutschland. In K. Mok & M. Stahl (eds.), Politische Kommunikation heute. Beiträge des 5. Düsseldorfer Forums Politische Kommunikation (pp. 167-186). Frank & Timme.

Reports, Working Papers, & Data Sets

(10) Ludwig, K., Müller, P., Freudenthaler, R., Chan, C.-h., & Wessler, H. (2023). Implizite und explizite Stigmatisierung von ethnisch-gelesenen Gruppen in der deutschen Medienöffentlichkeit im Jahr 2022. MZES Fokus, 3. open access: https://doi.org/10.25521/mzesfokus.2023.275

(9) Bach, R. L., Areal, J., & Müller, P. (2023). Alternative News, Alternative Views? How Populist Alternative News Consumption Contributes to Political Attitudes During the 2021 Federal Election in Germany. /// open access (preprint): https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/g96w7

(8) Iana, A., Alam, M., Grote, A., Ludwig, K., Müller, P., Weinhardt, C., Sack, H., & Paulheim, H. (2022). NeMig - A bilingual news collection and knowledge graph about migration (v1.0.0). Zenodo. /// open data (upon request): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7442425

(7) Iana, A., Grote, A., Ludwig, K., Alam, M., Müller, P., Weinhardt, C., Sack, H., & Paulheim, H. (2022). GeNeG: German news knowledge graph (v1.0.1). Zenodo. /// open data (upon request): https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6039372

(6) Müller, P., & Denner, N. (2020). ¿Qué hacer frente a las fake news? [Spanish translation of Müller & Denner, 2019]. Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit. /// open access: https://shop.freiheit.org/#!/Publikation/911

(5) Müller, P., & Denner, N. (2019). What Can Be Done to Counter Fake News? [English translation of Müller & Denner, 2019]. Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit. /// open access: https://shop.freiheit.org/#!/Publikation/797

(4) Müller, P., & Denner, N. (2019). Was tun gegen Fake News? Eine Analyse anhand der Entstehungsbedingungen und Wirkweisen gezielter Falschmeldungen im Internet (2nd, fully revised edition). Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit. /// open access: https://shop.freiheit.org/#!/Publikation/792

(3) Müller, P., & Denner, N. (2017). Was tun gegen “Fake News”? Eine Analyse anhand der Entstehungsbedingungen und Wirkweisen gezielter Falschmeldungen im Internet. Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit.

(2) Wirth, W., Schemer, C., Schulz, A., Wettstein, M., Wirz, D. S., & Müller, P. (2017). A Multi-Dimensional Measure to Assess Populist Attitudes in the Public in Eight Languages (NCCR Democracy Working Paper No. 87). Zürich: NCCR Democracy.

(1) Wirth, W., Esser, F., Wettstein, M., Engesser, S., Wirz, D., Schulz, A., Ernst, N., Büchel, F., Caramani, D., Steenbergen, M., Bernhard, L., Weber, E., Hänggli, R., Dalmus, C., Schemer, C., & Müller, P. (2016). The Appeal of Populist Ideas, Strategies and Styles: A Theoretical Model and Research Design for Analyzing Populist Political Communication (NCCR Democracy Working Paper No. 88). NCCR Democracy.

Book Reviews

(3) Müller, P. (2019). Review of „Populistische Kommunikation und die Rolle der Medien“ (by Franzisca Schmidt). r:k:m rezensionen:kommunikation:medien. /// open access: https://www.rkm-journal.de/archives/21851

(2) Müller, P. (2016). Review of „Digitaler Journalismus: Dynamik – Teilhabe – Technik“ (by Volker Lilienthal, Stephan Weichert, Dennis Reineck, Annika Sehl, & Silvia Worm). Publizistik, 61, 489-491. /// https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-016-0293-5

(1) Müller, P. (2014). Review of „Naive Medientheorien und Third-Person Perception. Eine Untersuchung zur Integrierbarkeit beider Konzepte“ (by Thorsten Naab). Publizistik, 59, 225-227. /// https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-014-0201-9

Contributions to Professional Journals

(2) Müller, P. (2019). Der Wert der Wertung. In M. Johann (ed.), Debatte: Wissenschaft als Beruf. aviso – Informationsdienst der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, (69), 7. /// open access: https://www.dgpuk.de/sites/default/files/Aviso_69_02-2019.pdf

(1) Müller, P., & Denner, N. (2018). Die Debatte: Postfaktizität. Eine Einleitung. In P. Müller & N. Denner (eds.), Debatte: Postfaktizität – der (neue) Kampf um die Wahrheit und die Kommunikationswissenschaft. aviso – Informationsdienst der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, (66), 3. /// open access: https://www.dgpuk.de/sites/default/files/Aviso%20_66_01-2018.pdf